24 Tokotaha ngaohi kapeti ʻi he taʻu ʻo e fakaʻauha

+86-15957194752 aurorachen@shenhai-ex.com

TheDifferenceBetweenExplosion-ProofLevelATBTCT|TechnicalSpecifications

Fakaikiiki fakatekinikale

Ko e faikehekehe ʻo e tuʻunga ʻo e fakaʻauha-tohi fakamoʻoni ʻi he BT CT

Firstly, ʻOku fakataumuʻa ʻa e ngaahi meʻangaue kotoa ʻe tolu ki he maluʻi ʻo e efu pea to ʻi he kulupu ʻo e ngaahi meʻangaue ki hono fakamoʻoniʻi hono ua. ʻOku peheni ʻa e fakafuofua ki he fakamoʻoni fakaʻauha: ʻI HE < BT < CT.

Faʻahinga TuʻúFakafaʻahinga ʻo e kasaNgaahi kasa fakafofongaSiʻisiʻi taha Ignition fakatupu ivi
ʻI he malumalu ʻo ʻekuIMethane0.280mJ
Ngaahi meʻa ʻi tuʻa ʻi he ʻaʻakuIIAKasa0.180mJ
IIBEthylene0.060mJ
IICFakapaaki ʻo e0.019mJ

CT devices feature a superior dust-proof rating and may be utilized in areas designated for AT and BT. Neongo ia, AT and BT devices are not suitable for areas that require CT standards.

ʻI hono fakalea ʻe niʻihi, CT devices can substitute for AT and BT, but AT and BT devices cannot substitute for CT.

ʻOsi v:

Hoko Atu:

Maʻu ha kupuʻi lea ?